Friday, March 28, 2008

Godzilla and the Bomb


Here is a 2005 New York Time piece by Brent Staples on the story behind the Japanese film Gojira, and how it was re-worked into to American "Godzilla, King of the Monsters"

an excerpt:

Film directors who once stood helpless while studios recut their movies can now console themselves with "directors' cuts" put out on DVD. This option was not available to the influential Japanese director Ishiro Honda, whose 1954 classic "Godzilla" - known in Japan as "Gojira" - made a household name of the towering reptile who stomped a miniature Tokyo into the ground while raking the landscape with his fiery thermonuclear breath.

A fire-breathing reptile is pretty much the same in any language. But the butchered version of the film that swept the world after release in the United States was stripped of the political subtext - and the anti-American, antinuclear messages - that had saturated the original. The uncut version of the film is due out on home video early next year, and should push serious Godzilla fans to rethink the 50-year evolution of the series. It should also show them that they were hoodwinked by the denatured Americanized version that dominated many of their childhoods in the late 20th century. At the same time, Godzilla fans are on the edge of their seats about a new film that should be released in the United States soon.

The original "Gojira" was never intended as a conventional monster-on-the-loose movie. Nor did it resemble the farcical rubber-suit wrestling matches or the domesticated movies (with Godzilla cast as a mammoth household pet) that the series degenerated into during the 1960's and 70's.

As the historian William Tsutsui reminded us in last year's cult classic, "Godzilla on My Mind," the 1954 movie was a dark, poetic production that dealt openly with Japanese misgivings about the nuclear menace, environmental degradation and the traumatic experience associated with World War II.

The nuclear annihilations of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were still fresh in mind when the famous Toho Company embarked on the "Gojira" project in 1954. But Japanese fear of nuclear catastrophe was given fresh impetus in the spring of that year, when the United States detonated a huge hydrogen bomb at Bikini Atoll in the central Pacific. Japanese fishermen aboard a trawler were exposed to nuclear fallout. Japanese consumers panicked and declined to eat fish after irradiated tuna was found to have slipped into the nation's food supply.

In the film, the H-bomb blast awakens and irradiates a dinosaur that has somehow escaped extinction. The reptile strides ashore and begins his trademark devastation of the Tokyo landscape. The nuclear antecedents were not at all lost on Honda, a World War II veteran who passed through the bombed-out city of Hiroshima and witnessed the damage firsthand. Honda later said that he envisioned the fiery breath of Godzilla as a way of "making radiation visible," and of showing the world that nuclear power could never be tamed.

He also told an interviewer: "Believe it or not, we naïvely hoped that the end of Godzilla was going to coincide with the end of nuclear testing."

That was clearly a tall order for a monster movie. But Honda's message never had a chance because most of the world never received it. The American company that bought the rights to distribute the film in this country cut a large chunk from Honda's original film and rearranged the plot. . . .

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

Clothing of the Future

Bizarre video from the 1930's on predictions for future fashion:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U9eAiy0IGBI

Thursday, March 20, 2008

1939 World's Fair

Here are two video shorts from the 1939 World's Fair in NYC:

Part One

Part Two

Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Brave New World 1956 CBS radio play


Here is an audio file of the 1956 CBS radio play of Brave New World, narrated by Aldous Huxley. Here is the recent Los Angeles Times article indicating that the upcoming film version of the novel will be directed by Ridley Scott. As I said in class, you may use this novel as a primary source in your historical methods paper.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Prospectus

A few students have asked me to elaborate on what's expected for the prospectus this week, and this is the answer that I've given them:



Your main goal is to analyze an issue raised by one of the primary sources and to compare and evaluate how two different historians address that issue. For instance, if you started w/ Donnelly's Caesar's Column, your topic might be Victorian responses to the social dislocations caused by the industrial revolution. For your two secondary sources you might use John Kasson's Civilizing the Machine and Leo Marx's The Machine in the Garden. You would likely start with a discussion of the issues raised by your primary source (Donnelly) and then compare the methods and perspectives that Kasson and Nye bring to bear upon those issues. In your comparison of their perspectives, you would ideally reveal something of your own perspective, e.g. Kasson's right and Marx is wrong, or vice versa, or they're both wrong, etc. Another example of this might be Ralph 124C41+ and comparison of two books on consumerism or technological utopianism; or Ape and Essence and a comparison of two books on cultural responses to the advent of nuclear weapons; or Neuromancer and a comparison of two books on the growth and impact of the Internet. In any of these cases, the bulk of your paper would be a comparison of your secondary sources, but your primary source would establish and illustrate the basic issues that those secondary sources address. This is an unconventional assignment for a 300 level course, so I'm asking people to produce a prospectus now in order to get these questions on the table early. The prospectus won't be graded, but it should give me a fairly clear idea of what sources you intend to use and why.

Saturday, March 8, 2008

Reminder: Paper Prospectus due in class on 3/18

HISTORICAL METHODS PAPER: All students will be required to write a 12-15 pg. paper (approx. 3000 to 3750 words) that analyzes the approach of two different historians to a single historical subject. One of the books used for this paper should be a primary source from the course syllabus, while the other two books should be works of historical analysis that relate directly to the issues raised by that primary source. As these secondary sources are yours to choose, they may or may not come from the list of course readings. A 1-2 pg Prospectus (including a completed bibliography of sources) for this paper will be due in class on 3/18 and the paper itself will be due on 4/17.


Remember, your primary source options are:

Donnelly, Ignatius. Caesar's Column

Gernsback, Hugo. Ralph 124C41+

Huxley, Aldous. Ape and Essence

Gibson, William. Neuromancer

Thursday, March 6, 2008

The Birth of the Comic Book




Men of Tomorrow by Gerard Jones provides some excellent background on Hugo Gernsback, science fiction "fandom", and the birth of the comic book.

Wednesday, March 5, 2008

Lego Steam Man


Bids You Good Luck on the Exam Tomorrow

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Midterm Review: Terms and Themes

TERMS:

Icarus

Babel

Prospero

The New Atlantis

Monticello

The Age of Reason

"Report on Manufactures"

F. C. Lowell

"The Celestial Railroad"

The Market Revolution

"What hath God wrought?"

Vicksburg

The Eads Bridge

"The Brick Moon"

Haymarket

Prince Cabano

Chicago, 1893

"The Dynamo and the Virgin"

Modern Electrics

The Armory Show

"Scientifiction"

RADAR

Fritz Lange

Jerry Siegel and Joe Shuster


THEMES:

Religion, science, and technology in American culture from the age of Deism to the age of Social Darwinism.

Differing portrayals of race, class, and gender in Donnelly's Caesar's Column, Gernsback's Ralph 124C4+ and Fritz Lange's Metropolis (consider our discussion of both the German and U.S. versions of this film).

The Natural and the Technological Sublime in nineteenth century American culture.

The "consumer's sublime" as described by David E. Nye and depicted in the work of Gernsback and Donnelly.